Fear and resignation after ‘world’s most powerful company’ pays Trump a $100 billion ‘protection ...

It was a surprise ceremony at the White House presided over by President Donald Trump to unveil a $100 billion investment from what he called the world’s...
Antonetta Bechtelar · 12 days ago · 3 minutes read


Taiwan's Tech Tremors: TSMC's US Expansion Sparks Security Fears

A White House Celebration, a Taiwanese Dilemma

President Trump hailed it as a triumph: a $100 billion investment from Taiwanese tech giant TSMC, the world's leading advanced microchip manufacturer. However, this celebratory announcement reverberated across the Pacific, igniting anxiety in Taiwan over the potential loss of its "silicon shield" – the semiconductor industry that fuels global technology and arguably bolsters its defense against China.

Former Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou didn't mince words, accusing the ruling party of essentially "selling" TSMC to Trump as a "protection fee," a move he deemed a "major national security crisis." This sentiment underscores the deep-seated fear that political pressure could erode Taiwan's technological dominance.

The Silicon Shield: A Deterrent or a Bargaining Chip?

TSMC produces over 90% of the world's advanced microchips, the essential components powering everything from smartphones to AI to military hardware. This global reliance is perceived by many in Taiwan as a crucial deterrent against potential Chinese aggression. The fear is that relocating this vital industry weakens this "silicon shield," making Taiwan more vulnerable.

Adding to this unease is Trump's rhetoric. Accusations of Taiwan "stealing" the US semiconductor industry and demands for "protection" payments have sown seeds of doubt about the future of US-Taiwan relations.

The situation in Ukraine further fuels these concerns. Some Taiwanese citizens, like retiree Tammy Chao, draw parallels between their situation and Ukraine's, fearing that Taiwan could become a bargaining chip in international power plays. "TSMC was the best card," she lamented, worried that Trump's approach could leave Taiwan vulnerable.

Balancing Act: Economic Realities and Geopolitical Risks

Not all share this pessimistic view. Fred Lin, a finance professional, believes TSMC's decision was a pragmatic one in the face of international political realities. "Who doesn't pay protection fees to the US?" he asked, highlighting the complex dynamics at play.

Experts also caution against oversimplifying the comparison between Taiwan and Ukraine. Taiwan's strategic location and China's broader geopolitical ambitions are significant factors influencing the island's security, not just its semiconductor industry. Min-yen Chiang, a researcher at a Taipei think tank, points out that Taiwan's strategic importance predates its technological prowess, referencing the US Seventh Fleet's deployment to the Taiwan Strait in 1950, a time when Taiwan had no semiconductor industry.

TSMC's Perspective: Meeting Demand and Maintaining Agility

TSMC CEO CC Wei emphasized that the US investment was driven by customer demand, particularly from US tech giants like Apple and Nvidia seeking to mitigate supply chain risks. He assured the public that the company's commitment to Taiwan remains strong, with cutting-edge development still concentrated on the island.

Analysts have lauded TSMC's maneuverings. Ming-Chi Kuo, a respected tech analyst, described TSMC as "the most successful non-US company in negotiations with the Trump administration," highlighting the flexibility built into the investment plan.

The Ripple Effect: Pressure on Global Tech Giants

TSMC's massive investment sets a precedent. Trump's tariff-driven approach, in contrast to Biden's subsidy-focused strategy, appears to be yielding results, with major companies like Apple and Oracle also pledging significant US investments.

This puts pressure on other semiconductor giants like Samsung and Intel, who are likely to face increased scrutiny and pressure to follow suit. University of Chicago economist Chang-Tai Hsieh warns, however, that concessions to such pressure can be a slippery slope. “Once you agree to blackmail, then there’s no end of it,” he cautioned.